Bars, taverns, nightclubs, and restaurants have a responsibility to implement reasonable measures to provide a safe environment for guests and employees. A central task in many of our cases is to…
Whether a particular person should have been permitted to enter a bar, nightclub, or other venue where alcohol was served can be relevant to a host of legal disputes involving assaults, vehicle crashes, and other injuries.
In this article, liquor liability expert PJ Romanos will address the standard of care for alcohol-serving establishments to screen potential patrons for age, visible intoxication, and other potentially serious safety and security threats.
The bouncer or doorman is the first line of defense at many bars and nightclubs. Their actions, including who they allow to enter and their ability to identify and mitigate potential threats, are critical in maintaining safety within the confines of the bar as well as for the public.
In the context of a forensic investigation, the issues most frequently evaluated relative to door operations include:
The extent to which an establishment follows industry standards or established policies and procedures can create a compelling argument for or against liability under specific circumstances.
The industry standard accepted forms of identification are state-issued driver’s licenses and ID cards, passports, alien registration cards, and U.S. active-duty military ID. However, the individual business has some discretion to determine which forms of ID they choose to accept.
To effectively check IDs, doormen should be equipped, at minimum, with a flashlight and an ID checking guide. The flashlight can be used to closely scrutinize the ID. The ID checking guide is a guidebook that contains sample IDs from all across the US and Canada. Establishments in some markets may need to keep an international version on-hand.
Once the doorman asks for the ID, they must have the patron remove the ID from his/her wallet so that a closer inspection can be made. They will then determine if the ID is valid, by thoroughly inspecting it and asking questions of the patron. If they have any doubt that the ID is valid, they can ask for a second form, use the ID checking guide to verify the ID authenticity, and may refuse entry or service if they are unable to confirm the validity of the ID.
If a club allows patrons under the age of 21, they should have an established process to distinguish those who are of legal drinking age versus those who are not. A common method is to issue bracelets to those who are of legal age, but service staff should still ID patrons if they are suspicious that an individual is underage. The service staff should use the same steps as the doorman when checking the ID’s of patrons.
Common breakdowns in ID checking policies & procedures:
The standard of care for the hospitality industry is to refuse entry to intoxicated persons. Not only is it unlawful to serve alcohol to an intoxicated person, but having intoxicated people on the premises can lead to a variety of problems.
When it comes to screening for impairment, some states and municipalities require doormen, other security staff, and service staff to be trained in a responsible service of alcohol class such as TiPS or ServSafe.
These classes establish a scientifically informed foundation for identifying signs of impairment such as loud behavior, using inappropriate language, glassy eyes, slurred speech, stumbling or swaying.
Common breakdowns in screening for intoxication at the door:
At times, the mere presence of bouncers or security personnel at the door may be enough to deter any unacceptable behaviors. However, the development, implementation and enforcement of policies and procedures for screening patrons and ensuring underage and intoxicated people are not served is necessary for success.
Once a security plan is developed and rolled out to all necessary personnel, the security team needs to be held accountable for their adherence or lack thereof to these policies and procedures. Management and ownership need to take an active role and have enough floor presence to monitor the performance of their teams.
Management should address any inconsistencies that are observed while walking the floors. It is also important for the security team to keep an active and current log of any incidents that may occur throughout a shift.
Some of the areas that the doormen/security team needs to be mindful of during each and every shift include:
Common breakdowns:
While bouncers/doormen have other responsibilities beyond screening patrons, security truly does start at the door. By not allowing entrance to anyone that may pose a threat to the overall safety of the establishment, a minimum standard of premises safety and security can be maintained.
The factors discussed here will be considered by an expert when evaluating whether an alcohol serving establishment met the standard of care for reasonable security. Robson Forensic is equipped to provide the full range of expertise required towards the resolution of claims and litigation involving the abuse or misuse of alcohol and other drugs. Our firm includes experts in toxicology, dram shop, premises security and police practices, all of whom are nationally recognized leaders in their fields.
To discuss your case with an expert, call us at 800.813.6736 or submit an inquiry.
Bars, taverns, nightclubs, and restaurants have a responsibility to implement reasonable measures to provide a safe environment for guests and employees. A central task in many of our cases is to…
At a catered event, the industry standard of care when multiple drinks are served to an individual is that the bartender/server be able to observe the recipients of those drinks to prevent service to…
In this article, the Premises Security Experts discuss security as it relates to Bars, Taverns, Restaurants and Nightclubs. This article was published by HospitalityLawyer.com in their December 2017…