To help ensure that camera footage is accurate and complete, it may be necessary to analyze the file(s) through a forensically sound process. Video evidence comes in many formats, and the footage may…
With the prevalence of video recording devices (phones, smart security systems, dash cams, etc.), video evidence is often available to support litigation of just about every type. This article outlines where to look for video evidence, and initial steps to take to assist in obtaining such video before it is lost.

Video clips and associated metadata (with few exceptions) are stored as digital files to a local storage device (SD card, internal memory, or hard disk drive) or remote storage device such as a corporate server, cloud storage, or some combination thereof.
These storage platforms generally record video until they are full, then overwrite the oldest video with the newest. It is critical to act fast to secure video evidence before the data is overwritten and irretrievably lost.
One fact often overlooked in litigation is that surveillance video contains more than just images. Video data includes metadata (data about data) such as the recording date, time, camera details, GPS location, associated audio files, etc. which may provide more value to the investigation than the images themselves.
Even if video data has been overwritten (or deleted), a forensic investigation can potentially uncover other useful evidentiary material. For example, most systems contain a system log showing any changes made, including manual manipulation, copying, or deleting of data.
While we typically think of video data coming from overt camera systems such as those installed in commercial properties, other possible sources of video include:
While there are few standards that apply, many businesses size their video storage to retain up to 30 days of video, however if additional cameras or other changes have been made to the system without increasing the storage, retention times may decrease.
Most, if not all, of these systems have the ability to either mark data to be saved, preventing overwriting, or the data may be exported for preservation prior to being overwritten.
Below are some suggested items for an order of preservation followed by items to request during the discovery process.
Few systems retain data longer than 30 days, and many will be shorter. For this reason, a timely and thorough preservation notice is critical.
Remember, for each minute the system is operating, it is deleting a minute of old data from each camera in the system.
While the actual video files are important, details about the overall system are often critical.
Typical requests for video evidence are worded like: “Provide all relevant video from the incident on January 2, 2024.” This lack of specificity can lead to counsel receiving a single 90-second video lacking context from a site with a dozen cameras that should have relevant video.
Again, don’t let the system owner/operator determine what they think is relevant, they may have no training in investigation, video surveillance, or litigation whatsoever. This includes systems operated by security and law enforcement personnel; it’s always best for the legal and subject matter experts to determine what is and is not relevant.
There are many other key details that may be important to request during discovery. As in any other discovery process it is wise to consider a qualified subject matter expert to assist in asking the right questions.
The video analysis experts at Robson Forensic are familiar with the design, installation and operation of video systems, from simple home and dashcam devices to complex, enterprise systems covering hundreds of locations. Not only can we assist in ensuring thorough retrieval of video evidence, forensic services such as interpretation and analysis, measurement and speed calculation, analysis of system logs, and other services are available.
For more information, call us at 800.813.6736 or submit an inquiry.
To help ensure that camera footage is accurate and complete, it may be necessary to analyze the file(s) through a forensically sound process. Video evidence comes in many formats, and the footage may…
Forensic analysis of CCTV video evidence is potentially broader than scrutinizing the visible elements in a recording. System analysis can often be used to identify other relevant video files,…
A frequently asked question in any type of case where video evidence is being used is whether footage has been edited. That is, whether portions of the footage have been intentionally removed. Even in…