In this case, a security guard was badly scalded by hot water from an outdoor hose bibb. Robson Forensic was retained to explain the biomechanics of scalds and opine on the plaintiff's ability to…
Dr. Lauren Smith is a biomedical engineer with specific expertise in biomechanics and medical devices. She applies her expertise to forensic casework involving traumatic injuries including motor vehicle crashes, workplace and sports injuries, premises liability disputes, and litigation involving medical implants and devices.
During her time at the University of Tennessee, Dr. Smith’s research focused on orthopedic implant design and performance, as well as evaluation of surgical techniques. Her assessment of joint kinematics included pre- and post- operative normal and diseased joints, providing analysis for both orthopedic companies and surgeons. Dr. Smith continued this work as an orthopedic industry consultant, where she applied her expertise in the areas of medical imaging, computer modeling, and clinical study data collection, furthering her work in assessing orthopedic implant design, performance and surgical technique.
In addition to her work in orthopedics implant design, Dr. Smith pioneered Type 1 Diabetes research within the College of Engineering at the University of Tennessee with her development of software in Insulin Pump systems and Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) systems. She possesses a strong knowledge of drug delivery systems and the development and monitoring of software and algorithms to monitor device performance.
Dr. Smith attended the University of Tennessee, earning a Bachelors, Masters and Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering with a concentration in Biomechanics. She has been published numerous times in the Journal of Arthroplasty and has presented her research at conferences with the Biomedical Engineering Society (BMES) and the International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA).
Investigates and analyzes biomechanical and biomedical injuries; injury causation; and medical equipment, devices and implants.
Assesses Injuries: Applying physics, anatomy, and physiology, assesses injuries involving:
Determines Cause: Applying engineering principles, determines:
Typical Personal Injury Cases Involve:
Associate
2025 to presentProvide technical investigations, analysis, reports, and testimony toward the resolution of personal injury litigation involving injury analysis and causation, medical equipment, medical devices, and procedures.
Engineering Consultant
2024 to 2025Graduate Research Assistant - Center for Musculoskeletal Research 2019-2024
Orthopedics
Insulin Pump Systems
Team Leader - University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine 2018-2019
Undergraduate Research Assistant - Center for Musculoskeletal Research 2017-2019
University of North Florida Institute of Police Technology and Management (IPTM) - Occupant Kinematics for the Traffic Crash Reconstructionist, 2025
Peer Reviewed Journal Publications:
L.A. Smith, M. LaCour, H. Cates, R. Komistek. “Does Cruciate Ligament Substitution and Implant Asymmetry Make a Difference for Total Knee Arthroplasty Kinematics? A Multi-Implant Evaluation,” Journal of Arthroplasty, Volume 40, Issue 4, 1074-1082, Elsevier Publishing Company, April 2025
L.A. Smith, M. LaCour, H. Cates, R. Komistek. “Can Asymmetry in TKA Design Lead to More Normal-Like Post-Operative Kinematics? A Multi-Implant Evaluation,” Journal of Arthroplasty, Volume 39, Issue 7, 1699-1706, Elsevier Publishing Company, July 2024
L.A. Smith, M. LaCour, D. Dennis, R. Komistek. “Anatomic vs Dome Patella: Is There a Difference Between Fixed vs Mobile Bearing TKAs?,” Journal of Arthroplasty, Volume 36, Issue 11, 3773-3780, Elsevier Publishing Company, November 2021
L.A. Smith, J. Nachtrab, M. LaCour, H. Cates, M. Freeman, R. Komistek. “In Vivo Knee Kinematics: How Important are the Roles of Femoral Geometry and the Cruciate Ligaments?,” Journal of Arthroplasty, Volume 36, Issue 4, 1445 – 1454, Elsevier Publishing Company, October 2020
Refereed Published Abstracts and Conference Presentations:
L.A. Smith, M. LaCour, R. Komistek, M. Ries, J. Victor, “Achieving High Weight-Bearing Flexion with an ACL Retaining TKA: Is Inclusion Criteria a Difference Maker?,” ISTA 35th Annual Congress, Nashville, TN, August 2024
L.A. Smith, M. LaCour, R. Komistek, “Does Cruciate Ligament Substitution and Implant Asymmetry Make a Difference for Total Knee Arthroplasty Kinematics?,” ISTA 35th Annual Congress, Nashville, TN, August 2024
L.A. Smith, M. LaCour, R. Komistek, “In Vivo Knee Kinematics: Does Anterior Stabilization in a TKA Make a Difference?,” ISTA 34th Annual Congress, New York, NY, August 2023
L.A. Smith, R. Komistek, M. LaCour, S. Haas, H. Cates, J. Victor, M. Vieira da Silva, “Kinematic Outcomes of a Bi-Cruciate Stabilized (BCS) TKA Implanted by Multiple Surgeons: Assessing Surgeon Variability,” ISTA 34th Annual Congress, New York, NY, August 2023
L.A Smith, R. Komistek, M. LaCour, M. Ries, J. Victor, M. Freeman, “Achieving High Weight-Bearing Flexion with an ACL Retaining TKA: Is Surgeon an Even Larger Difference Maker?,” ISTA 34th Annual Congress, New York, NY, August 2023
G. Dessinger, L.A. Smith, M. LaCour, R. Komistek. “Worldwide In-Vivo Weight-Bearing Kinematics for Three BCS TKA Cohorts Compared to the Normal Knee,” ISTA 33rd Annual Congress, Maui, Hawaii, June 2022
G. Dessinger, M. LaCour, L.A. Smith, R. Komistek. “In-Vivo Kinematics of Over 1300 Total Subjects, Including Four Implant Types and Normal Knee Comparisons,” ISTA 33rd Annual Congress, Maui, Hawaii, June 2022
VD. Nguyen, M. LaCour, L.A. Smith, R. Komistek. “Kinematics Comparisons of the Patella Alta with the Normal Patella After Total Knee Arthroplasty,” ISTA 33rd Annual Congress, Maui, Hawaii, June 2022
L.A. Smith, M. LaCour, G. Dessinger, R. Komistek. “In Vivo Knee Kinematics: Are Bi-Cruciate Substituting TKAs More Likely to Achieve Optimal Kinematics?,” ISTA 33rd Annual Congress, Maui, Hawaii, June 2022
L.A. Smith, M. LaCour, G. Dessinger, R. Komistek. “Kinematic Outcomes of a Single Surgeon Implanting Multiple Posterior Cruciate Retaining (PCR) TKA Designs: Does the Implant Really Matter?,” ISTA 33rd Annual Congress, Maui, Hawaii, June 2022
L.A. Smith, M. LaCour, G. Dessinger, R. Komistek. “In Vivo Knee Kinematics: How Important Is ACL Retention in Restoring Native Knee Kinematics?,” ISTA 33rd Annual Congress, Maui, Hawaii, June 2022
L.A. Smith, H. Cates, M. Freeman, J. Nachtrab, R. Komistek. “In Vivo Knee Kinematics: How Important Are the Roles of Femoral Geometry and the Cruciate Ligaments?,” ISTA Annual Congress, Virtual, November 2020
L.A. Smith, G. Dessinger, H. Cates, R. Komistek. “In Vivo Kinematics Comparison for Subjects Having a PCR TKA or a BCR TKA to the Normal Knee During Deep Knee Bend,” ISTA 32nd Annual Congress, Toronto, Canada, October 2019
L.A. Smith, G. Dessinger, H. Cates, R. Komistek. “In Vivo Kinematics Comparison For Subjects Having A PCR TKA Or A BCR TKA To The Normal Knee During Deep Knee Bend,” Biomedical Engineering Society Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, October 2019
v. 05/14/25
In this case, a security guard was badly scalded by hot water from an outdoor hose bibb. Robson Forensic was retained to explain the biomechanics of scalds and opine on the plaintiff's ability to…
In this 30-min webinar, biomedical engineer Dr. Lauren Smith will review the fact pattern from a motorcycle v. tractor trailer collision in which pre-existing pathologies had to be considered in the…