Robson Forensic was retained to determine if the forces generated in a two car, same direction crash were sufficient to cause injuries. The Plaintiff was driving slowly, approaching a stoplight, when…
This article provides an introduction on the capabilities and limitations of vehicle EDR (black box) data. Presented for lawyers working on vehicle crash cases, this article covers the benefits and potential pitfalls of using EDR data.
The Event Data Recorder (EDR) or vehicle ‘black box’ is one of the most useful tools available to crash reconstructionists. For vehicles equipped with this technology, and when the recorders work as intended, the EDR provides crash investigators with valuable information that in many instances could not otherwise be collected.
Despite the many advantages of EDRs, these systems have their shortcomings. In this article we provide an introductory lesson on the benefits and potential pitfalls of using EDR data. We also explain some of the information that is commonly provided within EDR read-outs and some insight on when you should question the data presented.
History, Fundamentals, and Regulations of EDRs
General Motors began recording collision data to gauge real world performance of airbags and other restraint system components by recording the crash pulse. Later, GM added the ability to store vehicle parameters such as speed prior to the collision. Event data recording is typically handled by the Airbag Control Module (ACM), but in some vehicles data can be stored and retrieved from the Engine Control Module (ECM) or Powertrain Control Module (PCM).
In the industry, we generally call them Event Data Recorders (EDR) - the systems concerning the collection, storage, and retrievability of onboard motor vehicle crash event data. Crash Reconstructionists and Police can often retrieve crash and/or pre-crash data with Bosch Corporation’s Crash Data Retrieval (CDR) System or manufacture specific software/hardware. Not all vehicles can be downloaded as:
Check with a Robson Forensic expert or the Bosch Corporation to determine which vehicles can be downloaded. In general, the CDR can access some GM vehicles as old as 1994, Fords from 2001, Toyotas from 2003, Chryslers from 2006, and some Honda, Mazda, Nissan, Volvo, and Volkswagens from 2012. As of Sept. 1, 2014, all new cars, light trucks, vans and SUVs sold in the United States must be equipped with an Event Data Recorder (EDR) in accordance with 49CFR563.
Available Data
The designed purpose of the EDR is to monitor data from specified sensors and record that data in the event of a collision that is of sufficient force to cause an airbag deployment. Some systems will also record events that are near the threshold for airbag deployment. In performing this task, the ACM uses integrated and remote mounted accelerometers and possibly other sensors that monitor the deceleration rate and heading of a vehicle to determine the severity of a collision and determine what, if any, passive restraint systems should be deployed. The various vehicle manufacturers (OEMs) have unique criteria used in creating the deployment threshold. Some of the crash parameters that may be recorded include:
Potential Problems with EDR Data
Many reconstructionists prefer to rely on EDR data to provide an unbiased measure of pre-impact actions and impact speeds. However, there are times when EDR information should not be relied upon, or requires in depth interpretation, such as when:
When a vehicle impacts multiple objects, the timing of the recorded events can be flawed or out of sequence, as data is continually overwritten. Impacts that compromise the electrical system may yield bad data. Data in the EDR comes from multiple systems, this data can be out of sync or wrong compared to the Airbag Control Module’s timing circuit and accelerometer(s). Newer EDRs may have the ability to record more than one event. EDR components can corrode over time. Also, data can be overwritten or plain wrong if the download is performed improperly.
Collisions and vehicle maneuvers that alter the wheel speed relative to the actual vehicle speed can yield misleading data. This can occur when the vehicle goes airborne, spins, loses or locks-up a wheel, rolls over, or is cut in half. Narrow and light weight object impacts as well as small overlap collisions are often either not recorded or the data is flawed. The duration of the impact also may exceed the recording threshold of the EDR.
Every expert in the Crash practice at Robson Forensic came to our firm after longstanding careers in the automotive industry. As automotive engineers they understand vehicle dynamics and how vehicles respond before, during, and after a crash. Our engineers, through their education and training, have a thorough understanding of physics and vehicle systems and how they affect the nuances of crash reconstruction.
To discuss your case with a subject matter expert, submit an inquiry through our website.
Robson Forensic was retained to determine if the forces generated in a two car, same direction crash were sufficient to cause injuries. The Plaintiff was driving slowly, approaching a stoplight, when…
Automotive engineer, Steven Becker, was retained to determine if a Dodge engine failure was the result of an improper repair. The engine of a 2002 Dodge Intrepid with approximately 100,000 miles…
In this article, the automotive engineers at Robson Forensic provide an overview of the individual components and sensors that make advanced driver systems and autonomous vehicles possible. In related…