ArticleIn this case, a vehicle driver was fatally injured when her vehicle struck an unattended horse in the roadway. The horse had escaped from an arena where it was confined for the first time the previous evening.
Equine expert, Dr. J. Tim Potter was retained by plaintiff’s counsel to determine if the actions/inactions of the property owner created dangerous conditions that caused or contributed to the fatal injury of the plaintiff.
Escaped Horse V. Vehicle Collision – Expert Investigation
Description of the Event
On the evening before the fatal crash, the property owner introduced two new horses to his property. Upon their arrival, the horses were placed in an arena with cattle and other livestock. That evening the horse involved in the fatal crash escaped from the arena.
The manner in which the horses were introduced to a new location, as well as the adequacy of the arena fencing were the main technical issues addressed by Dr. Potter.
Introduction of Animals to the Arena
Within every herd, a “pecking order” is established, and every animal fits into that hierarchy from most to least dominant. When new animals are introduced into a group, an adaptation period occurs in which the pecking order is reorganized. The adaptation period can range from a few hours to a few days, depending on the behavioral tendencies of the groups.
A commonly accepted practice is for the introduction of new animals into a group to occur during a time of the day that provides adequate time to observe the animals and ensure that any dominance issues have been resolved. Unresolved dominance issues among animals within a shared enclosure will frequently result in animals reverting to their basic instincts of “fight or flight” during the hours of darkness. This fight or flight response is usually precipitated by a display of agonistic (aggressive) behavior between animals as they establish the dominance hierarchy.
In this instance, the issue of dominance was further complicated by the presence of multiple species, in this case being horses and cattle. The property owner failed to ensure that the new animals were introduced properly to the arena; this was a cause of the horse’s escape and the plaintiff’s crash.
The owner violated best practices by placing the horses in an arena with cattle and other livestock late in the day. This method was not consistent with common practices that owners of horses and livestock should know. In fact, the owner testified that he knew the proper protocol of introducing new animals to a group.
Adequacy of Arena and Fencing
The arena in this incident was constructed using metal corral panels attached to wooden posts. Photographs of the arena showed that several of the corral panels were secured at the top of the panel with a rope or chain, yet several were not secured to the post at the bottom of the panel.
Good fencing is defined as that which will inhibit horses and other animals from trying to go over or through the fence. Bad fencing is described as that which is not sturdy, and does not inhibit a horse or other animals from attempting to go through or over it. Utah State University Extension describes qualities of good and bad fencing1:
- Not prone to cause injury
- Inhibits horse from trying to go through or over
- Inhibits injury if horse gets caught in it
- No corners
- Not as visible
- Not sturdy
- Materials cause injury
- Does not inhibit horse from attempting to go through or over
In this case the property owner failed to provide adequate fencing that inhibited the horse from escaping. The failure to properly secure the panels and inspect the fencing at the time that the horse was introduced to the arena violated industry standards and allowed the horse to escape form the arena; this contributed to the cause of the plaintiff’s fatal crash.
Horses are predictable and understanding their behavioral tendencies is critical. The defendant in this case failed to follow established best practices of animal science by introducing new animals into the arena late in the day, thereby increasing the likelihood of unresolved dominance issues carrying into the night. These actions, combined with the inadequacy of the arena fence, allowing for the unknown and uncontrolled release of the horse outside of the arena, created the dangerous conditions that caused the plaintiff’s fatal crash.
HORSE SAFETY INVESTIGATIONS
Robson Forensic provides specialized forensic experts to investigate injuries to humans as well as claims of neglect and abuse toward animals. Our experts can approach these investigations from the perspectives of horse trainers, facilities owners, nutritional specialists, and more.
Submit an inquiry or contact animal scientist, Dr. Tim Potter to discuss your case and how Robson Forensic can assist.
Dr. Potter is an Equine Scientist with experience in both the academic and corporate sectors. He provides technical investigations, analysis, reports, and testimony toward the resolution of commercial and personal injury litigation involving areas of equine science, including appraisals, behavior and training, facility design and construction, fencing, nutrition, reproduction, and safety issues. Nutrition work includes feed formulation and production issues, on-farm feeding management, and analyses of interactions between formulated feeds and use of supplementation in the total diet. Reproduction work includes evaluation of nutritional status and reproductive efficiency, manipulation of the estrous cycle and effects of stress and environmental factors associated with reproductive status. Behavior and training work includes behavioral factors associated with training, and evaluation of potential abuse issues associated in the training process. Safety work includes evaluation of factors and scenarios that are related to safety, including lesson barns, safety issues at horse shows and at private facilities, and determining on-site person(s) of knowledge.SOURCE 1. SCOTT S. MCKENDRICK, UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY, EQUINE FENCING AND BUILDING OPTIONS